Democrats have long ago bought into the idea that minorities can only
relate to people who look like them and must be coddled by people who
do not. The Party of Lincoln, on the other hand, carries the unenviable
burden of telling black, brown, and yellow people that it welcomes
them, even as it insists that they have no special place, purely as a
result of their race, in the party's core beliefs about the free market
and individual freedom.
So the black man in the White House came to power by incessantly
invoking his biography and identity. Barack Obama reminded everyone
every day on the campaign trail that he is the son of a man from Kenya
and a woman from Kansas. Michael Steele, the black man at the center of
Republicans' political comeback efforts, prefers to talk about
"personal freedom, liberty, and the desire for self-governing."
It is a stark contrast. Unfortunately, political realities skew in
favor of the man of biography and the party of identity politics.
Racial entitlement often creates a corrosive effect on minorities. Some
brazenly demand jobs, college admissions, or business transactions
based on race or gender, while others insist that identity trumps ideas
or objective considerations. In that vein, Obama's Supreme Court
nominee believes that "a wise Latina woman with the richness of her
experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a
white male who hasn't lived that life."


Comments