Even now, defenders of Obama's preventive detention policy (i.e.,
indefinitely imprisoning people with no charges) insist that this is
necessary because those in Guantanamo are "too dangerous to release"
and we cannot convict them in a real court. What's their basis for
believing that people who have been convicted of absolutely nothing are
nonetheless "too dangerous to release"? The Government -- our trusted leaders -- claim it's true, so it must be.


Comments