I agree with this even though I seldom agree with Oliver Kamm:
Atheism is a philosophical position. I hold to it, and I regard the
spread of atheism over the long term as both likely and overwhelmingly
beneficial. But for cultures born of the Enlightenment, private
religious belief is not so much an enemy as an irrelevance. What
matters is that religion should not intrude into the public sphere. It
must make its accommodation, however it chooses to get there, with
modern mores, liberal values and secular education. If it won't, then
it makes itself an enemy.


Comments